Powerful & scalable eDiscovery for law firms

iCONECT helps small, mid-size, and large law firms navigate complex discovery and data challenges with confidence. Get the tools you need to collect, organize and analyze data for litigation, investigation and corporate decision-making.

Trusted by the world's leading corporations & legal teams

Better discovery starts with better intelligence

iCONECT is a powerful eDiscovery and data intelligence platform used by law firms to solve complex legal discovery needs at any scale. Use our suite of AI-driven review and analytics tools to transform data into responsive action.

AI-Powered Entity Identification & Reporting

Use AI algorithms to automatically detect and identify entities such as people, organizations or locations within data sets.

Then, generate detailed reports for better data analysis and decision-making.

Intelligent Mass Action PII Redaction

Utilize intelligence algorithms to efficiently redact PII in large volumes of data, including names, phone numbers and addresses.

Ensure compliance with data protection regulations and enhance privacy measures by masking this sensitive information.

Intelligent, Dynamic Data Visualization

iCONECT uses interactive dashboards to turn your data into charts and graphics that adapt and respond in real time to user interactions and changing data inputs.

This helps you uncover patterns and trends from complex datasets.

Unique Synthetic Document Searching

Create synthetic documents that mimic real-world documents to create a conceptually similar search.

This approach allows you to evaluate search accuracy, relevance and performance across various document types.

AI Reviewer Productivity Metrics Reporting

iCONECT uses AI algorithms to analyze reviewer performance and productivity during document review processes.

Through this approach, you can generate detailed reports and insights that reveal whether your reviewers are efficient and accurate when reviewing documents.

Add GenAI tools to your eDiscovery workflow

iCONECT has harnessed AI for over a decade and leverages advanced large language models (LLM) to streamline a wide range of review and extraction tasks:

Record summary: Generate concise summaries or abstracts of large volumes of data.
Describe, transcribe and translate: Describe images, transcribe audio and translation services for many languages.
PXI identification and extraction: Identify and extract PXI from large datasets.

Simple integrations start here

When you choose iCONECT, you don’t have to worry about leaving your favorite applications behind. Our RESTful API allows us to seamlessly integrate with key systems so you can maintain and manage all your data on our platform.

Leading data intelligence solutions for law firms

iCONECT is purpose-built for eDiscovery, data governance and cyber data mining. Give your legal team the tools they need to make smarter data decisions for every litigation case.

The iCONECT advantage

24/7 Domestic Support

iCONECT’s support is second to none. When you need an expert to answer your questions or troubleshoot a problem, rely on us to always answer the phone.

Predictable Pricing

Investing in iCONECT is easy, with flexible pricing models that include monthly or annual terms, and multiple deployment options, including SaaS and onsite implementations.

Secure Deployment

iCONECT deployment offer a strong, multi-layered security program that includes SOC2 certification, regular security training, regular penetration testing, and careful development practices to ensure the safety of your data. Whatever your deployment preferences, our solutions come with strong workstation and server security, rigorous data protection and handling protocols, and controlled access. All supported by our rapid-response team of security experts.

In-House & SaaS Options

iCONECT offers flexibility in how you store your sensitive legal data. With in-house and SaaS options, we help you manage your data securely and compliantly.

Flexible Workflows

Save time by replicating your current workflows with iCONECT. Our data intelligence platform also allows you to optimize your workflow by turning features on and off.

Time-Saving Templates

iCONECT saves you time and resources by allowing you to establish a template you can use again and again.

Existing Vendor Channel

iCONECT works with reputable vendors to ensure you receive the service you deserve. When you need an expert to collect, translate, pick up and drop off your data, count on our vendors to get the job done.

Stable Platform

iCONECT has been trusted by legal teams and service providers for decades to solve countless review and discovery needs. Our foundation and technology were designed in tandem, offer unmatched data security and stability, and have been iterated and improved upon continuously by our engineering and legal experts.

WHY iCONECT?

Why law firms love iCONECT

“The support department is phenomenal; they are awesome to deal with.”

How law firms leverage iCONECT

At the time of its approval, blood-thinner Pradaxa had no available antidote. It was responsible for serious bleeding events, including death in thousands of patients, with the argument being that Boehringer used deceptive marketing practices to promote its new category of anticoagulant. The company settled 4,000 lawsuits for $650 million and the company was required to pay $95 million to settle a case over improper marketing.

Plaintiffs v. Boehringer Ingelheim (Pradaxa Litigation)  iCONECT used by the law firm of Schlichter, Bogard & Denton

Mattel was forced to pay $88.5 million to MG Entertainment in a dispute over the Bratz line of dolls. The court found that Mattel did not own drawings of Bratz dolls. The Bratz dolls hurt the sales of Barbie dolls significantly over the period of time that the Bratz dolls were on the market.

Mattel Inc. v. MGA Entertainment Inc. (2011) iCONECT platform used by Quinn Emmanuel Urquart & Sullivan, LLP through a Legal Service Provider in TrialGraphix (Kroll On-Track)

1,300 cases / plaintiffs in a MDL Litigation against Bayer claiming its Yasmin lin of birth-control pills caused blood clots in women. Bayer AG (BAYRY) said settlements of U.S. lawsuits over claims that its Yasmin line of birth-control pills caused blood clots have increased to more than $402 million.

Plaintiffs v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (2011) CONECT platform iCONECT platform used by the law firm of Schlichter, Bogard, Bogard & Denton

Cases filed against Merck over adverse cardiovascular events associated with Rofecoxib and the adequacy of Merck’s warnings. Merck will pay nearly $1 billion to resolve criminal charges and civil claims related to its marketing of Vioxx, a widely used pain medicine that the giant drug maker pulled from the market in 2004. Close to 50,000 Plaintiff Lawsuits v Merck & Co, Inc. (settled in 2007 for $4.85 billion).

Plaintiffs v. Merck (Vioxx Litigation) (2011 & 2007) iCONECT used by Merck through a Legal Service Provider in ACT – US DOJ v. Merck & Co., Inc. (settled Nov. 2011)

BP and three other energy companies reached a settlement with with thousands of individuals and businesses affected by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill that killed 11 workers and fouled the Gulf of Mexico with millions of gallons of oil. BP officials said they expect the company to pay out approximately 7.8 billion as a settlement with more than 100,000 plaintiffs who are suing the oil giant and others for their role in the spill.

Plaintiffs v. BP Oil (Deepwater Horizon. BP Oil (Deepwater Horizon Litigation) (2010) iCONECT used by BP Oil through a Legal Service Provider in conjunction with Herman, Herman, Katz & Coltar

The case relates to an incident in 2006 when slops from a cargo ship that Trafigura had chartered were dumped in Abidjan, Ivory Coast’s main city. Oil-trading firm Trafigura Beheer BV said it has agreed to pay nearly £30 million ($48.7 million) in compensation to people in Ivory Coast who say they were made ill by waste dumped in the West African country.

Plaintiffs v. Trafigura Beheer (Ivory Coast Pollution) (2009) iCONECT used by Leigh Day through Trilantic International Limited, a Legal Service Provider based in the United Kingdom

Chinese Drywall refers to an environmental health issue involving defective drywall manufactured in China and imported to the USA starting in 2001. Laboratory test of samples for volatile chemicals have identified emissions of the sulfurous gases carbon disulfide, carbonyl sulfide, and hydrogen sulfide. The case name of the major lawsuit is MDL 2047, In re: Chinese-manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation. Settlements ongoing.

Plaintiffs v. Chinese-Manufactured Drywall (2009) iCONECT used by Parker, Waichman, Alonso LLP

Oracle sued SAP, alleging that SAP had engaged in copyright infringement by downloading thousands of copyrighted documents and programs from Oracle’s Customer Connection website. Oracle, the world’s largest maker of database software, won a $1.3 billion jury verdict in the case in 2010. A federal judge reduced the award to $272 million. The companies agreed on a judgment for $306 million in damages “to save time and expense of this new trial.”

Oracle Corp v. SAP AG (2007) iCONECT used through the law firm of Jones Day

A cross-practice Sutherland team of more than 30 attorneys served as counsel for British Nuclear Fuels plc in BNFL’s $5.4 billion sale of Westinghouse Electric Company to Toshiba Corporation. The purchase agreement was signed in London on Monday, February 6, 2006. The $5.4 billion purchase price represents a significant return on BNFL’s investment, as the company bought Westinghouse in 1999 for only $1.1 billion.

British Nuclear Fuels $5.4 billion sale of Westinghouse Electric Company to Toshiba Corporation (2006) iCONECT platform used by Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP

On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated while returning to Earth, killing the crew of seven. Beyond simply determining the immediate physical cause of the accident, NASA elected to expand its analysis into changes to the vehicle, to the Space Shuttle Program, and to NASA itself, to best move forward with a successful Return to Flight program. This analysis involved the review of materials by world-wide experts from academia, the aerospace industry, the federal government, and the military (including members remaining on the International Space Station). The Task Group’s Final Report was delivered to the NASA administrator, US Congress, and the American public in July 2005.

Return to Flight Task Group (Final Report 2005) iCONECT used by NASA via Lockheed Martin

AMD launched the lawsuit against its rival, Intel, the world’s leading microprocessor manufacturer. AMD claimed that Intel engaged in unfair competition by offering rebates to Japanese PC manufacturers who agreed to eliminate or limit purchases of microprocessors made by AMD or a smaller manufacturer, Transmeta. Burying a very large hatchet in the computing industry, Intel agreed to pay Advanced Micro Devices $1.25 billion as part of a settlement.

AMD v. Intel (2005) iCONECT used through the law firm of O’Melveny & Meyers, LLP

Bombardier settled a long-running dispute over the purchase price paid in its acquisition of the Adtranz rail car division for $300 million less than it was seeking. Claims that the German manufacturer had vastly overstated the value of the Adtranz division – in a purchase that had briefly vaulted Bombardier to the #1 global train-making spot – were filed at the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce in 2001. With the settlement, the parties had finalized what turned out to be a $1.1 billion deal.

Bombardier Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler AG (2004) iCONECT used by Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C./Freshfields, UK

Kodak sued Sun in 2002, claiming that Sun’s Java programming language violated three of its patents. Case resulted in the jury’s finding of infringement by Sun Microsystems in favor of Kodak, which resulted in a settlement of $92 million in exchange for a license under Kodak’s patents.

Eastman Kodak Co. v Sun Microsystems, Inc. (2004) iCONECT used by Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati through a Legal Service Provider in Texas

Federal energy regulators investigation of Enron to review that the bankrupt power-trader had used “deceit” and “false information” in an attempt to profit from California’s troubled electricity market. In addition to probing three Enron subsidiaries for possible misconduct during the California crisis in 2000 and 2001, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigated two out-of-state electric utilities that did business with Enron.

FERC Western Energy Markets Investigation as Part of the Enron Investigation (2004) iCONECT used by FERC through a Legal Service Provider in Washington, DC

Digital lock and numbers, conveying cyber security

Make your next move the

right move

Take the first step toward better data response, governance or eDiscovery with iCONECT.

Powerful & scalable eDiscovery for law firms

Trusted by the world's leading corporations & legal teams